GEM KNOWLEDGE · LABORATORY NOTES
Quartz Muscovite (Brazil)
A specimen from a small Brazilian pocket find, examined for its dark prismatic crystals and inclusions in quartz.
Finding: Sample 9274, specimen 2, completed June 11, 2021, is quartz with dark dravite–schorl-series tourmaline and inclusions of muscovite, potassium feldspar and fluid. The quartz had trace titanium and iron in the measured area.
The report suggests a quartz vein related to a granitic pegmatite or a pegmatite influenced by magnesium-bearing surrounding rock. “Quartz Muscovite” is a practical market label for this material, but muscovite is not the only included mineral. A separate product photograph can be added later; the original report contains the specimen image.
View the original report
Select a page to enlarge it. 5 pages; findings are summarized in accessible text above.
Report images © Soul Body Gems, Alexander Falster and the Maine Mineral & Gem Museum. Please acknowledge all three when referring to these results. Findings apply to the specimen examined.
Understanding the report figures
Use this guide alongside the written findings and the original report transcript. It explains the purpose of each analytical figure and preserves the laboratory’s own figure labels. The interpretations apply to the tested specimen; signals alone do not establish the identity of every similar-looking stone.
-
Electron microscope image: This view shows small-scale regions selected for analysis. Its brightness contrast helps distinguish regions with different compositions; it is not a photograph of their natural colors. Numbered spots connect this view to the analyses listed in the report.
Laboratory figure caption: Fig. 2: Backscattered electron image of sample 2.
-
Elemental spectrum: The peaks record characteristic X-ray signals from elements in the analyzed spot or area. This is an analysis of that location, not automatically of the entire specimen. Any mineral identification or uncertainty named in the laboratory caption is retained below.
Laboratory figure caption: Fig. 3: Energy dispersive spectral analysis of spot 1 in Fig. 2. (dravite-schorl series)
-
Elemental spectrum: The peaks record characteristic X-ray signals from elements in the analyzed spot or area. This is an analysis of that location, not automatically of the entire specimen. Any mineral identification or uncertainty named in the laboratory caption is retained below.
Laboratory figure caption: Fig. 4: Energy dispersive spectral analysis of spot 2 in Fig. 2. (quartz)
-
Electron microscope image: This view shows small-scale regions selected for analysis. Its brightness contrast helps distinguish regions with different compositions; it is not a photograph of their natural colors. Numbered spots connect this view to the analyses listed in the report.
Laboratory figure caption: Fig. 5: Backscattered electron image of another area ofsample 2.
-
Elemental spectrum: The peaks record characteristic X-ray signals from elements in the analyzed spot or area. This is an analysis of that location, not automatically of the entire specimen. Any mineral identification or uncertainty named in the laboratory caption is retained below.
Laboratory figure caption: Fig. 6 : Energy dispersive spectral analysis of spot 1 in Fig. 5. (potassium feldspar)
-
Electron microscope image: This view shows small-scale regions selected for analysis. Its brightness contrast helps distinguish regions with different compositions; it is not a photograph of their natural colors. Numbered spots connect this view to the analyses listed in the report.
Laboratory figure caption: Fig. 7: Backscattered electron image of another area ofs ample 2.
-
Elemental spectrum: The peaks record characteristic X-ray signals from elements in the analyzed spot or area. This is an analysis of that location, not automatically of the entire specimen. Any mineral identification or uncertainty named in the laboratory caption is retained below.
Laboratory figure caption: Fig. 8 : Energy dispersive spectral analysis of spot 1 in Fig. 5. (muscovite)
Read the original laboratory report as text
The following text and tables are transcribed from the original laboratory document. Figure captions identify the report images; the laboratory interpretations and limitations are preserved.
Laboratory report 1
Analytical Result Report
Sample id: 9274 (sample 2)
Submitted by: K. Bitner
Date submitted: June 2, 2021.
Date completed: June 11, 2021.
Operating conditions: An AMRAY 1830 SEM operated at 25 kV acceleration potential, 26 mm working distance, 15 degrees sample tilt, coated with 250 Å carbon. Using the X-ray fluorescence attachment with 35kVpotental in conjunction with the EDS system.
Fig. 1: Photograph of the specimens #2, 6 cm maximum.
Fig. 2: Backscattered electron image of sample 2.
Fig. 3: Energy dispersive spectral analysis of spot 1 in Fig. 2. (dravite-schorl series)
Fig. 4: Energy dispersive spectral analysis of spot 2 in Fig. 2. (quartz)
Fig. 5: Backscattered electron image of another area ofsample 2.
Fig. 6 : Energy dispersive spectral analysis of spot 1 in Fig. 5. (potassium feldspar)
Fig. 7: Backscattered electron image of another area ofs ample 2.
Fig. 8 : Energy dispersive spectral analysis of spot 1 in Fig. 5. (muscovite)
Fig. 9: Photomicrographs of the dravite-schorl and muscovite/potassium feldspar inclusions. 2 mm width of view in each image.
Summary of findings: This is a beautiful specimen: (Fig. 1). Most noticeable are the dark prismatic crystals on the quartz (Figs. 2-4 and Fig. 9). Besides lots of fluid inclusions, there are also inclusions of potassium feldspar (Figs. 5 and 6 and Fig. 9) and muscovite (Figs. 7-9). The quartz itself only contains traces of titanium (170 ppm) and iron (110 ppm). Specimens like this are likely found in quartz veins closely associated with granitic pegmatites or in pegmatites that have assimilated sufficient amounts of mafic country rock which would bring up the magnesium. Phlogopite is a mineral more typical for metamorphic rocks that had a provenance of a mafic igneous rock.
Date: June 11, 2021 Signature





