← Back to Gem Knowledge

GEM KNOWLEDGE · LABORATORY NOTES

Rhodonite from Peru

A pink and dark patterned specimen from Peru, analyzed to distinguish its mineral components.

Tested specimen: 8115 (Peru egg) · Report completed: April 14, 2020

Key finding: Both the pastel and brighter pink portions were identified as rhodonite with some calcium substitution and very little iron substitution. The dark material was identified at least in part as the manganese sulfide alabandite, called “alabandine” in the report.

What the report means

This entry applies to the tested Peruvian specimen. Other rhodonite localities and color combinations should be considered separately.

View the original test results

Select any report page to enlarge it. The pages are reproduced from the analytical report for this individual specimen.

Mineral identification is specific to the sample analyzed. The full report pages preserve the laboratory's wording and limitations.

Understanding the report figures

Use this guide alongside the written findings and the original report transcript. It explains the purpose of each analytical figure and preserves the laboratory’s own figure labels. The interpretations apply to the tested specimen; signals alone do not establish the identity of every similar-looking stone.

  • Electron microscope image: This view shows small-scale regions selected for analysis. Its brightness contrast helps distinguish regions with different compositions; it is not a photograph of their natural colors. Numbered spots connect this view to the analyses listed in the report.

    Laboratory figure caption: Fig 1: Backscattered electron photomicrograph of area 1 in sample 8115.

  • Elemental spectrum: The peaks record characteristic X-ray signals from elements in the analyzed spot or area. This is an analysis of that location, not automatically of the entire specimen. Any mineral identification or uncertainty named in the laboratory caption is retained below.

    Laboratory figure caption: Fig. 2: Energy dispersive spectrum of spot 1 in Fig. 1. (rhodonite)

  • Elemental spectrum: The peaks record characteristic X-ray signals from elements in the analyzed spot or area. This is an analysis of that location, not automatically of the entire specimen. Any mineral identification or uncertainty named in the laboratory caption is retained below.

    Laboratory figure caption: Fig. 3: Energy dispersive spectrum of spot 2 in Fig. 1. (alabandine)

  • Elemental spectrum: The peaks record characteristic X-ray signals from elements in the analyzed spot or area. This is an analysis of that location, not automatically of the entire specimen. Any mineral identification or uncertainty named in the laboratory caption is retained below.

    Laboratory figure caption: Fig. 4: Energy dispersive spectrum of spot 3 in Fig. 1. (rhodonite)

Read the report as text

This transcription makes the laboratory findings, figure captions, and table values available without opening the page images. Refer to the original images above for visual details.

Laboratory report

                                                 Analytical Result Report

Sample id: 8115 Peru egg
Submitted by: Kathreen Bitner
Date submitted: April 10, 2020
Date completed: April 14, 2020
Operating conditions: JEOL JSM-6400 operated at 25 kV acceleration potential, 15 mm working distance, 15 degrees
sample tilt, coated with 250 Å carbon. Using the X-ray fluorescence attacement with 35kv potental in conjunction with
the EDS system




Fig 1: Backscattered electron photomicrograph of area 1 in sample 8115.




Fig. 2: Energy dispersive spectrum of spot 1 in Fig. 1. (rhodonite)
Fig. 3: Energy dispersive spectrum of spot 2 in Fig. 1. (alabandine)




Fig. 4: Energy dispersive spectrum of spot 3 in Fig. 1. (rhodonite)



Summary of findings: This is an interesting piece! Both the pastel pink and the brighter pink are rhodonite with some Ca
substitution but very little iron substitution, thus the clean pink colors. The dark material is at least in part a manganese
sulfide, alabandine! Alabandine is not that common.




Date: 4-14-2020          Signature

Report acknowledgment: These analytical results and report materials are the property of Soul Body Gems, Alexander Falster, and the Maine Mineral & Gem Museum. Any use or mention of these results requires full acknowledgment of all three.

← Back to Gem Knowledge

Results shown here apply to the specimens identified in the reports. A trade name or visual resemblance alone does not establish the composition of another piece.